OPINION: Health Act does not adhere to the rule of law

Government’s National Health Insurance (NHI) proposals have hit the headlines over the past months. The Free Market Foundation’s Health Policy Unit too, has focussed on what can be described as a misdirected and flawed policy. But the NHI is not the only problem in our national health regime.

The National Health Act (61 of 2003) is also holding South Africa back in terms of medical and healthcare development.                                                     

The Good Law Project’s Principles of Good Law report, published in 2015, contained an introduction to the meta-legal concept of ‘the rule of law’. In brief, the rule of law means that objectively-ascertainable principles of law govern society, rather than the arbitrary discretion or whims of politicians and bureaucrats. This is why ‘the rule of law’ is distinguished from ‘the rule of man’, which finds its expression in dictatorship or absolute monarchy.

The tenets of the rule of law were adopted into South Africa’s legal regime in terms of section 1(c) of the Constitution, which states that the State is founded on the “supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.”

Despite this, the National Health Act is based on questionable premises, which is clearly evident from its long title and preamble. Rather than focussing on the provision of quality healthcare, the Act takes a bureaucratic, ideological approach, seeking to create a “uniform health system” and unite the elements of the “national health system” – which encompasses both public and private infrastructure. It is an exercise in centralisation, more than anything else. And it is these provisions in the Act which pursue this problematic goal, that contravene the rule of law.

Section 36 of the Act provides that no person may establish a healthcare agency, such as a clinic or hospital, without having a ‘certificate of need’ issued to them by the Director-General of Health (DG). These certificates are also required if an existing establishment wishes to increase the number of beds in a hospital (increasing its capacity) or acquire new medical technology (increasing the quality of treatment).

These certificates are a particularly perverse instrument in this post-Cold War era, especially for an African developmental state.

While the Act does not define what a certificate of need is, in section 36(3) it outlines what the DG must take into account before a certificate can be issued. Among other things, it says that there must be a “consistent” development of health services in terms of “national planning”; that the inequities of the past must be corrected (in the context of whether or not someone may build a new hospital); there must be an “appropriate mix” of public and private health services; that it must be ensured that “ownership of facilities” are not for “perverse” reasons; and whether or not the private hospital is for-profit.

These are only some of the things the DG must bear in mind before issuing a certificate, and an independent article can be dedicated to the patent ridiculousness of each.

The unifying characteristic of all of these ‘factors’, however, is that they are wholly irrelevant to expanding the quantity, and quality, of healthcare to ordinary South Africans. In fact, many of the factors appear to be inspired by a dogmatic adherence to an ideology currently pursued by the ruling party rather than for ensuring the safety and comfort of patients.          

These factors violate the rule of law in that they do not have general application and are arbitrary. Going by the wording of the Act – the DG might reject an application for a certificate from a hospital in an affluent area to increase the number of beds because it is a for-profit establishment and the township hospital nearby has not been “developing consistently” with the wealthier hospital.

The vagueness of some of these blatant ideological factors also contributes to their inconsistency with the rule of law. For example, what does an “appropriate mix” of private and public services mean? The Act provides no guidance or criteria on how to determine an “appropriate mix”. What is and what is not appropriate is entirely within the arbitrary discretion of the DG and the Department of Health.

More worrying is the fact that the DG may withdraw a certificate if the establishment “obstructs the State in fulfilling its obligations” to provide healthcare to South Africans. How is it conceivable that a private clinic can ‘obstruct’ the government in its public healthcare duties? The vagueness of this provision opens it up to potential abuse.

The key provisions of the National Health Act violate the most basic tenets of the rule of law. The Act should be reconsidered in light of the fact that there is no rational relationship between these provisions and the State’s supposed constitutional obligation to provide healthcare, and that, in all likelihood, they violate the right of every South African to access healthcare.

Author: Martin van Staden is a law student at the University of Pretoria and the Academic Programmes Director of Students for Liberty in Southern Africa. The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Free Market Foundation.

 

@FMFSouthAfrica

Related Content

How will SA finmin Mboweni cut expenditure?

As the dust settles from South Africa’s emergency budget announcement, economist and ratings agencies have expressed their pessimism towards the finance minister Tito Mboweni’s ability to cut expenditure and deliver on his debt stabilisation plan. Joining CNBC Africa for this discussion are Mamello Matikinca-Ngwenya, Chief economist at FNB, Nicky Weimar, Chief Economist at Nedbank and Murtaza Moulvi, Head of Financial Markets at Standard Chartered Bank....

Ian Williamson outlines his plans for Old Mutual

After two stints as acting CEO of Old Mutual, the pan- African Financial services group has made official Iain Williamson’s role as head of the company. Williamson first served as acting Old Mutual in 2017 and again in 2019 when the company fired its former CEO Peter Moyo following a conflict of interest that resulted in breakdown of trust and confidence. Iain Williamson joins CNBC Africa for more.

This new ITC tool seeks to empower women in trade

A new tool by the International Trade Centre aims to track policies for women in trade.

How these global top 100 companies remain winners during the COVID-19 pandemic

The global top 100 companies have continued to outperform industry peers even amid the market volatility caused by Covid-19. Microsoft, Apple Netflix and Tesla are amongst those who have seen increased market capitalisation during Covid-19, joining CNBC Africa for more is Alice Tomdio, Director of Capital Markets at PwC Nigeria.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC AFRICA delivered to your inbox

More from CNBC Africa

WHO acknowledges ‘evidence emerging’ of airborne spread of COVID-19

But in an open letter to the Geneva-based agency, published on Monday in the Clinical Infectious Diseases journal, 239 scientists in 32 countries outlined evidence that they say shows floating virus particles can infect people who breathe them in.

Zimbabwe’s health minister, accused of corruption, sacked: statement

HARARE (Reuters) - Zimbabwe’s President Emmerson Mnangagwa has sacked health minister Obadiah Moyo with immediate effect for inappropriate conduct, a statement from...

Senegal slave island, moved by George Floyd’s death, renames Europe Square

“But we also said to ourselves...that in another sense it is celebrating the persecutor,” he said. “What happened to George Floyd was the final straw.”

Ivory Coast’s 2020 growth seen sliding to 0.8% due to pandemic

ABIDJAN (Reuters) - Ivory Coast’s gross domestic product growth is expected to slow to 0.8% in 2020 compared to a previous forecast...

Partner Content

Maktech’s Godwin Makyao: Now Is A Time of Entrepreneurial Opportunity in East Africa

As an executive decision-maker in both the telecommunications and tourism industries, Godwin Makyao could not have experienced a more diverse set of...

Sanlam launches urgent job-preservation initiative in response to COVID-19

Sanlam Investments is responding to the COVID-19 pandemic through large-scale support of the recovery of South African companies, from small enterprises to...

Trending Now

Implement substantive reforms, Paris Club creditors tell Zimbabwe

HARARE (Reuters) - Zimbabwe should implement sustainable political and economic reforms and successfully complete an IMF monitoring programme in order to normalise...

Parts of South Africa’s Edcon set for sale to Durban-based retailer

JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - Parts of South African retail chain Edcon are likely to be sold to private equity-backed Retailability Ltd, administrators in...

Africa to rebound from pandemic slump in 2021 but damage done: AfDB

JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - Africa is expected to partially rebound next year from a pandemic-induced economic slump, but it could still lose nearly...

Chinese factories to face headwinds in next phase of post-lockdown recovery

The rosy outlook stands in stark contrast to the dismal industrial landscapes of other economies still fighting COVID-19. Factory output plunged further in May from a year earlier in Japan, South Korea and the United States. Euro zone manufacturing output fell by a record 28% in April.
- Advertisement -