An echo of Prosecco? Italy vows to block EU label for Croatia’s prosek wine

Author Logo | Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:40:48 GMT

ROME, Sept 15 (Reuters) – Italy said on Wednesday it would protest to the European Commission over an attempt by Croatia to get EU-protected label status for a sweet white wine which Rome says has a name that is too similar to its own famed prosecco.

Brussels agreed on Tuesday to consider an application by Croatia to have its prosek wine classified as a recognised protected label (PDO), outraging Italian producers who said the name would create confusion among consumers.

Agriculture Minister Stefano Patuanelli told state broadcaster RAI the whole Italian government would oppose the application “in an adequate and compact way”.

Croatia says its historic amber-coloured dessert wine has always been called prosek and there is no danger of consumers confusing it with Italy’s dry, sparkling prosecco.

Italy, famed for its cuisine and food products, has often fought against recognition of “Italian-sounding” items such as Parmesan cheese, or Parma ham, which it says are mere imitations of the authentic Italian product.

Luca Zaia, governor of the northerly Veneto region, which is a major prosecco producer, called Croatia’s application “an absolute disgrace” and demanded vigorous opposition from Prime Minister Mario Draghi’s government.

“They are stealing an important label from our country, it’s as if they wanted to take away Ferrari,” he said.

Advertisement

In agreeing to consider Croatia’s request for PDO status for prosek, the Commission said the similar sound of a name, or “homonymy”, was not always sufficient reason for an application to be rejected.

“Two homonymous terms may co-exist under certain conditions”, so long as confusion for the consumer was avoided, EU Agriculture Commissioner Janusz Wojiciechowski said on Tuesday in answer to a complaint from Italy’s right-wing League party.

Italy had hoped a European Court of Justice judgment last week would help its case for prosek to be denied PDO status.

The court ruled the PDO label should be granted to protect products when “the use of a name creates, in the mind of an average European consumer who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, a sufficiently clear and direct link between that name and the PDO”. (Reporting by Francesco Zecchini, editing by Gavin Jones and Emelia Sithole-Matarise)

(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2021. Click For Restrictions – https://agency.reuters.com/en/copyright.html

 

Advertisement