Joburg's biggest land claim gets underway
Property owners in the south of Joburg had until 2 February 2017 to make representations to the Land Claims Commission following arguably the largest urban land claim in Gauteng.
Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:49:58 GMT
Disclaimer: The following content is generated automatically by a GPT AI and may not be accurate. To verify the details, please watch the video
AI Generated Summary
- The history of the land claim dates back to 1995, with over 1,300 properties in the South of Gauteng being claimed by the community. Despite extensive representations, a resolution is yet to be reached.
- The legislation allows for various outcomes if the claimed land is deemed non-restorable, including compensation or alternative land provision. Mediation and settlement processes among all parties can be time-consuming.
- A recent constitutional court ruling puts pressure on resolving long-standing claims within the next 18 months, prompting the Land Claims Commission to work towards swift resolutions. State entities must also navigate the land claims process to avoid disruptions to essential services.
Property owners in the south of Joburg had until 2 February 2017 to make representations to the Land Claims Commission following arguably the largest urban land claim in Gauteng. The community is claiming close to 1,377 properties in the South of Gauteng, which includes municipal land, residential housing, water facilities, schools, hospitals, hotels, and public infrastructure. The history of this case dates back to 1995, and despite the long timeline, a resolution is yet to be reached. Joining CNBC Africa to shed light on the process is Bulelwa Mabasa, Director at Werksmans Attorneys.
Mabasa explains that the land claim was initially deemed frivolous by the commission due to its vast scope, involving essential facilities like hospitals and schools. However, the Land Claims Court later ruled in favor of the community's claim. The question now is whether the claimed land is restorable, with considerations on the economic value and community services it provides. The legislation allows for alternatives like compensation or alternative land provision if restoration is not feasible.
Representations have been made to the commission by property owners, but the process of mediation and settlement among all relevant parties can be lengthy. The claim's publication does not equal proven validity, as further research by historians and anthropologists is necessary. A recent constitutional court ruling urges the commission to resolve long-standing claims within the next 18 months, putting pressure on the resolution process.
State entities are not exempt from the process and must apply to the Land Claims Court for exclusion. The rationale includes the need for government cooperation and ensuring essential services like road infrastructure and water distribution are not disrupted by the land claims process.
The community and property owners await further developments as the complex process of validating and resolving the extensive urban land claim continues.